Five and a half years since Google announced its plan to "destroy all information [it] can't index" and four months since the official start of the project (with the first book burnings), the search engine giant is showing signs that it is ready to take the next step in the massive undertaking.
The project, known as Google Purge, was a project aimed at making "the world to be as simple, clean, and accessible as the Google home page itself," according to CEO Eric Schmidt in his official mission statement. As said in this article by a prominent news source, the first milestone would be to destroy all copyrighted materials inaccessible to Google. This involved several book burnings, the most significant of which was the burning of first-version copies of Operation Dark Heart by the Pentagon, which reportedly is one of Google's military branches.
Though the Purge has not finished eliminating inaccessible books, Google seems ready to take on another part of the world of copyrighted information, this time in the form of private RSA encryption keys. This morning, Google sent a letter to educational technology giant Texas Instruments demanding the release of the RSA keys used on their Nspire line of calculators. The letter also contained the alternative: that all Nspires sold or being sold around the world would be confiscated and destroyed if the keys aren't released. "Keys are information, after all," said a company spokesperson. "And if we want all the information in the world easily accessible and searchable on Google Search, we need to have this information. It's that simple."
Texas Instruments had expressed concern about the program, even before Google's letter arrived. "Some things we need to keep private. It's business." One of the these areas of privacy lay in TI's RSA encryption of all its calculator models (with the notable exception of the TI-Ncourage). Some of this "privacy" was destroyed last year by third-party developers as they cracked the RSA keys one by one, but TI seems to be unwilling to give in, as seen when it encrypted its TI-Nspire line with a 1024-bit RSA key—far beyond the reach of modern computers.
"This is a chance for us to finally write unlimited third-party software for these calculators," said an independent Nspire developer. "Google's doing the right thing this time." Sure enough, Google is living up to its new motto: Don't be evil, unless it's necessary for the greater good.
At least three people have died of toxic fume inhalation after what appears to be a calculator-burning ritual Monday morning. Another four are currently in a nearby hospital, where they are in critical condition.
Evidently, this resulted from an organized calculator-burning ceremony in which eight mutual friends took part.
One member of the cult, who miraculously escaped through a nearby window, explained the situation: "You know that Prizm thing? That color graphing calc Casio released a few weeks ago? We wanted to show our loyalty to Texas Instruments by getting together a group of friends and burning a couple of Prizms." Apparently this act of devotion turned deadly when the group forgot to open the windows of the warehouse, essentially trapping themselves in with the toxic smoke produced by burning electronic parts.
This event is painfully reminiscent of the Kindle-burning tragedy that left eight dead last year. That incident also involved a group of eight who together burned a pile of electronics in protest.
Just two months after the Department of Education's recommendation that calculator usage be restricted in schools, a recent survey shows that school districts across the country are already taking action to reduce the number of calculators in use in U.S. schools. The survey, conducted by Erron Surveying Services, asked 38 school districts in 22 states for their opinions on electronic calculating devices. Twenty-six of the districts surveyed, representing over a hundred high schools, said they would introduce new rules banning calculators from being used in high school courses. Most planned to put these rules into effect by the next school year, but eight in particular said the would at least "consider" applying these changes by January first of 2011. Another three districts had not officially adopted plans for phasing out calculator usage but were in the process of deciding.
These new rules, created after a Department study discovered that students could play games on many models of graphing calculators, would ban the use of all calculators with graphing capabilities in all high school classrooms. As expected, the news caused outrage from parents and students.
"We need our calculators!" exclaimed a junior we interviewed. "They're really useful! And we don't always use them to play games in class. We need them for math, too."
A math teacher at a Chicago-area high school agreed. "I've known for years that students like to keep games on their calculators, which they sometimes play in class. It becomes a problem when the student ignores me every class, but I don't think we should ban calculators. At least not yet. We're still very used to using graphing calculator technology as a way of quickly investigating and learning about many different subjects in math."
A superintendent at the same school district had a different opinion. "Math classes have existed for hundreds of years before calculators were invented," he pointed out. "Why can't we go back to the old days, when there weren't so many distractions in the classroom?"
A spokesperson for the Department of Education also argued that calculators were "disrupting the learning environment in our education systems." "It was crushing," he said. "We never thought that even calculators could be used for gaming. We even found some students who had completely replaced the operating systems of their calculators, so that they were no longer able to do math at all. We know that students and teachers may argue that the benefits outweigh the costs, especially in advanced-level math classes, but the fact remains: Calculators are a prime cause of the deterioration of American education." Referring to the rules already in effect in school districts nationwide banning the use of iPods and cellular phones in class, he claimed that restrictions on calculators would help schools maintain an "environment suitable to learning."